Secure Technology Environments

Vulnerability Assessment & Penetration Testing

Understand where your environment is exposed, determine which weaknesses can create real risk, and get a clear path to remediation. Epicarp delivers structured VAPT across web applications, mobile applications and internal & external network infrastructure.

01 Vulnerability Assessment

Discover, analyse and classify security weaknesses across the defined attack surface.

02 Penetration Testing

Controlled testing to validate exploitability, attack paths and potential business impact.

Assessment Scope Web Mobile Network
VAPT Assessment
From Exposure to Validated Risk
Controlled Assessment
Web Applications · APIs
Mobile Android · iOS
Network Internal · External
Security Validation VAPT
01
Discover Identify weaknesses and exposure
02
Validate Test exploitability and attack paths
03
Analyse Determine severity and business impact
Output Prioritised Security Risk
Critical
High
Medium
01 Vulnerability Findings
02 Risk & Impact Analysis
03 Remediation Guidance
04 Retest & Closure
OWASP WSTG · MASVS / MASTG · NIST SP 800-115
02 Why VAPT

Finding a weakness is only the starting point.

Vulnerability assessment identifies potential security weaknesses across the agreed environment. Penetration testing goes further by examining whether those weaknesses can be practically exploited and what the resulting security impact could be. Together, they turn technical findings into meaningful security decisions.

What Really Matters The number of vulnerabilities alone does not tell you where the greatest risk exists. Validation helps distinguish theoretical exposure from weaknesses that require immediate attention.
Testing and validation are performed within an agreed scope, defined boundaries and rules of engagement.
From Finding to Decision Four questions VAPT should answer.
Evidence-led assessment
01
Discover Where is the weakness?
Identify vulnerable components, insecure configurations, exposed services and weaknesses within the agreed assessment scope.
Result Identified Vulnerability
02
Validate Can it be exploited?
Investigate and, where permitted, safely validate whether the identified weakness can be practically exploited.
Result Validated Exploitability
03
Understand What could an attacker achieve?
Understand possible unauthorised access, information exposure, privilege escalation, workflow manipulation or further compromise.
Result Security Impact
04
Prioritise What should be fixed first?
Consider severity, exploitability, exposure and business context to help focus remediation on the most important security risks.
Result Remediation Priority
Discover Vulnerability Assessment
+
Validate Penetration Testing
=
Understand Actionable Security Risk
The goal is not simply to report more vulnerabilities. It is to give your technology team the evidence, context and priorities needed to understand security exposure, remediate meaningful weaknesses and make better security decisions.
VAPT Outcome Evidence → Risk → Action
03 VAPT Services

Security testing where you need it.

Every environment presents a different security challenge. Select the area you want assessed and explore the typical security coverage included within that engagement. Web, Mobile and Network VAPT are independent services and can also be combined when broader security coverage is required.

Select a Service Explore the assessment that fits your environment.
Flexible Engagement

Start with one assessment area or combine multiple VAPT services based on your technology environment, business exposure and security priorities.

Web Security Assessment

Web Application & API VAPT

Assess web applications, business portals and supporting APIs for vulnerabilities that could allow unauthorised access, expose sensitive information, manipulate application behaviour or abuse critical business processes.

Suitable For Web Apps · Portals · APIs
Assessment Mode Black · Grey · White Box
Testing Reference OWASP WSTG / API Security

What we assess

Typical Assessment Scope
01 Authentication & Identity Login controls, credential handling, user account processes, MFA and identity-related security weaknesses.
02 Authorisation & Access Control User roles, object permissions, privilege boundaries and attempts to access information or functionality outside intended permissions.
03 Sessions & Tokens Session lifecycle, authentication tokens, cookies, timeout behaviour, logout controls and session protection.
04 Input Handling & Injection Input validation, injection scenarios, unsafe processing and client-side vulnerabilities affecting application security.
05 API & Data Security API endpoints, backend objects, sensitive information, access controls and security around application integrations.
06 Business Logic Business processes, transactions and legitimate application functions tested for unintended manipulation and abuse.
Testing Approach Automated discovery supported by manual security testing.

Potential weaknesses are investigated and, where permitted, safely validated to understand realistic exploitability and potential impact.

Assessment Outcome Security findings your application team can act on.

Findings include technical evidence, risk context and practical remediation recommendations for addressing identified weaknesses.

Mobile Security Assessment

Mobile Application VAPT

Assess Android and iOS applications across application storage, authentication, backend communication, runtime behaviour, platform interaction and application resilience.

Platforms Android · iOS
Assessment Style Static · Dynamic · Runtime
Testing Reference OWASP MASVS / MASTG

What we assess

Typical Assessment Scope
01 Application Storage Sensitive information stored within local files, databases, application caches and other device storage locations.
02 Authentication & Sessions User authentication, credential handling, tokens, biometric controls and mobile session behaviour.
03 Network Communication Transport protection, certificate handling and communication between the mobile application and backend services.
04 Platform Interaction Application permissions, exposed components, deep links and interaction with Android or iOS platform capabilities.
05 Runtime & Application Integrity Application manipulation, runtime behaviour, tampering and effectiveness of application integrity controls.
06 Reverse Engineering Embedded information, hard-coded secrets, code exposure and application resilience against analysis or reverse engineering.
Testing Approach Application, runtime and backend security assessment.

Mobile testing considers the application within its wider device, platform and backend communication environment.

Assessment Outcome A clearer view of mobile application exposure.

Findings provide evidence, impact context and remediation recommendations for application and engineering teams.

Infrastructure Security Assessment

Network VAPT

Assess internal or internet-facing network infrastructure for exposed services, vulnerable systems, insecure configurations and potential attack paths through the environment.

Scope Internal · External · Combined
Security Focus Exposure · Exploitability · Attack Paths
Environment Network · Servers · Services

What we assess

Typical Assessment Scope
01 External Attack Surface Internet-facing IP addresses, exposed ports, accessible services and perimeter infrastructure.
02 Internal Infrastructure Servers, systems, internal services and reachable infrastructure components within the agreed network scope.
03 Vulnerable Systems & Services Known vulnerabilities, outdated components and unnecessarily exposed network or infrastructure services.
04 Security Configuration Weak security configuration, insecure protocols and infrastructure control gaps that may increase exposure.
05 Remote Access & Perimeter VPN services, remote-access points, firewall exposure and externally accessible entry points.
06 Segmentation & Attack Paths Network trust boundaries, privilege opportunities and potential lateral movement across the environment.
Testing Approach Assessment from the agreed attacker perspective.

Internal and external network testing can be performed independently or combined based on the security objective.

Assessment Outcome Understand exposure and realistic attack paths.

Findings identify vulnerable assets, risk priorities and recommended controls for strengthening the network environment.

Your VAPT scope is defined before testing begins. Applications, infrastructure, user roles, assessment boundaries and permitted validation activities are agreed as part of the engagement.
Web · Mobile · Network
04 VAPT Methodology

From defined scope to verified closure.

A VAPT engagement should be controlled, repeatable and evidence driven. Epicarp follows a structured assessment journey that begins by defining the environment, validates meaningful weaknesses and supports remediation through to retesting. The exact testing activities are adapted to Web, Mobile or Network VAPT.

How We Work

Security testing with a clear beginning, boundary and outcome.

VAPT is not simply a sequence of scanning tools. The engagement combines defined scope, technical assessment, manual validation, risk analysis and verification.

01
Defined Scope and testing boundaries are agreed first.
02
Controlled Validation follows the permitted rules of engagement.
03
Evidence Led Findings are supported by technical evidence and context.
One Method · Different Depth

The overall journey remains consistent, while specific techniques change based on the selected Web, Mobile or Network VAPT service.

Assessment Journey Follow the engagement from preparation to closure.
Scroll to explore
01
Prepare Scope & Rules of Engagement

Define applications, infrastructure, IP ranges, users, test windows, exclusions and permitted activities before assessment begins.

Outcome Agreed Assessment Scope
02
Understand Attack Surface Mapping

Identify accessible applications, services, endpoints, infrastructure, technologies and other relevant entry points within scope.

Outcome Mapped Attack Surface
03
Discover Vulnerability Assessment

Apply appropriate automated and manual assessment techniques to identify vulnerable components, insecure configurations and potential weaknesses.

Outcome Potential Weaknesses Identified
04
Validate Controlled Penetration Testing

Investigate identified weaknesses and, where permitted, safely validate whether they can be exploited and what level of access may be achievable.

Outcome Validated Security Findings
From Technical Finding to Security Decision Validated weaknesses are analysed, prioritised and translated into practical remediation action.
05
Analyse Risk & Impact Analysis

Evaluate severity, exploitability, affected assets and potential technical or business impact to support meaningful prioritisation.

Outcome Prioritised Security Risk
06
Communicate Reporting & Remediation

Document confirmed findings with supporting evidence, affected areas, risk context and practical remediation recommendations.

Outcome Actionable VAPT Report
07
Verify Retest & Closure

Reassess remediated findings within the agreed scope to confirm whether identified weaknesses have been effectively addressed.

Outcome Verified Closure Status
Rules of Engagement Controlled testing starts with clear boundaries.
Scope, testing windows, exclusions, authorised techniques and escalation contacts are agreed before testing begins. This keeps validation focused on the intended environment and security objective.
Engagement Principle Defined Scope · Controlled Validation · Evidence
01 Scope
02 Map
03 Discover
04 Validate
05 Prioritise
06 Remediate
07 Verify
05 Deliverables & Retest

Findings that lead to clear action.

A useful VAPT report should do more than list vulnerabilities. It should explain what was identified, where the issue exists, how meaningful the exposure is and what your technology team should do next. Epicarp structures findings around evidence, risk, remediation and verification.

What You Receive

Technical detail for engineers. Context for decision-makers.

The VAPT deliverable is designed to support both remediation teams and stakeholders who need a clear view of the organisation's security exposure.

01
Evidence Enough technical context to understand and reproduce the finding.
02
Priority Severity and exposure presented so remediation can be prioritised.
03
Action Practical remediation guidance for the responsible technology team.
The Objective Give your team enough information to understand the weakness, fix it and verify the result.
VAPT Report A clear structure from summary to remediation.
Technical + Management View
01
Overview Executive Summary
High-level view of the assessment, overall exposure, significant findings and areas that may require priority attention.
02
Context Scope & Methodology
Agreed systems, applications or infrastructure, assessment perspective, boundaries, methodology and relevant testing conditions.
03
Findings Vulnerability Details
Confirmed weaknesses documented with affected components, technical context and supporting evidence.
04
Priority Severity & Risk Context
Findings prioritised using severity, exploitability, exposure and relevant impact considerations.
05
Action Remediation Guidance
Practical recommendations to help application, infrastructure or security teams address the identified weaknesses.
06
Verification Retest Status
Remediated findings can be reassessed and updated with the resulting verification or closure status.
Inside Each Finding Enough detail to move from finding to fix.
Individual findings are structured so technical teams can understand what was identified, why it matters and what action should be considered.
Evidence What was observed
Impact Why it matters
Severity How to prioritise
Remediation What should change
Remediation Verification

The assessment should not end with the report.

After remediation, selected findings can be retested within the agreed scope to determine whether the identified weakness has been effectively addressed and update its closure status.

01 · Remediate Your team addresses the finding. Configuration, code or security controls are updated.
02 · Retest Epicarp verifies the affected area. The remediation is reassessed against the original finding.
03 · Close Status is updated with verification evidence. Findings can be recorded as resolved, partially resolved or still open.
Visibility should continue through remediation. The final value of VAPT comes from understanding the exposure, taking corrective action and verifying that meaningful security weaknesses are no longer present.
End State Finding → Fix → Verify
06 Testing References

Structured testing. Practical judgement.

Recognised security testing references help provide consistency and coverage across an assessment. Epicarp combines framework-informed testing with environment-specific analysis, manual validation and practical risk context.

01
Web & API OWASP Web Security Testing
02
Mobile OWASP MASVS / MASTG
03
Risk Severity & Exploitability Context
04
Assessment Structured Security Testing Practices
Standards guide coverage. Evidence determines risk. Testing depth is adapted to the selected Web, Mobile or Network VAPT engagement and the actual technology environment.
Framework → Evidence → Risk
VAPT FAQ

Questions before you test your security.

Practical answers around VAPT scope, testing boundaries, production safety, findings, remediation and verification.

01 / GETTING STARTED

Understanding VAPT

4 QUESTIONS
01 What is VAPT and why does our organisation need it?

Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing helps organisations identify security weaknesses and understand which exposures may create meaningful risk.

Vulnerability assessment identifies potential weaknesses, while controlled penetration testing goes further by validating selected vulnerabilities, attack paths and potential impact within the agreed scope.

DISCOVER Vulnerability Assessment
+
VALIDATE Penetration Testing
=
OUTCOME Actionable Security Risk
02 Is vulnerability assessment the same as penetration testing?

No. They are related but serve different purposes.

VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

Identify weaknesses

Discover vulnerable components, insecure configurations, exposed services and other potential weaknesses.

PENETRATION TESTING

Validate risk

Where permitted, investigate whether selected weaknesses can be practically exploited and understand their potential impact.

03 How often should VAPT be performed?

The appropriate frequency depends on the organisation's technology environment, exposure, business risk and how frequently systems or applications change.

Security testing may be considered after significant releases, infrastructure changes, new internet-facing services, major security changes or as part of a periodic security assurance programme.

Testing should follow change.

A rapidly changing application or infrastructure environment may need assessment more frequently than a relatively static environment.

04 Can VAPT be performed for small and mid-sized organisations?

Yes. VAPT does not need to begin as a large enterprise-wide exercise.

The engagement can focus on the assets that matter most — such as an internet-facing application, API, mobile application, selected public IP addresses or critical network infrastructure.

Additional assessment areas can then be added as the organisation's security requirements evolve.

02 / SCOPE & ASSESSMENT

What can be tested

4 QUESTIONS
05 What types of environments can Epicarp assess?

VAPT can be scoped around different technology environments depending on your requirement.

01 APPLICATION SECURITY Web & API

Web applications, portals, business applications and APIs.

02 MOBILE SECURITY Android & iOS

Mobile application, storage, runtime and backend communication.

03 INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY Network

Internal and external networks, servers, services and infrastructure.

06 Can Web, Mobile and Network VAPT be performed separately?

Yes. Web Application & API VAPT, Mobile Application VAPT and Network VAPT can be commissioned independently.

They can also be combined when your security requirement spans multiple technology environments.

Web & API + Mobile + Network

The engagement should be based on your actual technology environment and security priorities rather than applying unnecessary testing everywhere.

07 What is the difference between internal and external Network VAPT?
EXTERNAL VAPT

Internet-facing exposure

Assesses authorised public-facing IP addresses, services and perimeter infrastructure from an external attacker perspective.

INTERNAL VAPT

Internal exposure

Assesses selected systems, services, trust boundaries and potential attack paths from within the authorised internal network.

08 What information is required before VAPT begins?

Requirements vary depending on the selected VAPT service, but the preparation stage normally establishes:

Applications / URLs IP Addresses Network Ranges Test Accounts User Roles Testing Window Exclusions Technical Contacts Permitted Activities

These details are agreed as part of the engagement scope before testing begins.

03 / CONTROLLED TESTING

Testing with defined boundaries

4 QUESTIONS
09 Can VAPT be performed without disrupting our production environment?

VAPT should be performed within agreed boundaries and with consideration for the operational sensitivity of the target environment.

Before testing begins, the scope, permitted activities, restrictions, test window, exclusions and escalation contacts should be agreed.

01 Define Scope & assets
02 Restrict Sensitive activity
03 Coordinate Testing window
04 Escalate When required
!

Testing cannot be treated as completely risk-free. The engagement should be planned and controlled according to the sensitivity of the environment.

10 What are Rules of Engagement?

Rules of Engagement establish the operating boundaries for the assessment before testing begins.

Scope Authorised Assets Test Window Exclusions Permitted Techniques Contacts Escalation

This helps ensure that testing remains focused on the intended environment and security objective.

11 Do you require privileged access to perform VAPT?

Not necessarily. The required access depends on the type of assessment and the agreed testing perspective.

Some assessments may begin without authentication, while others may use standard-user or authorised test accounts to assess authentication, authorisation, application roles and protected functionality.

Any credentials required for the engagement should be purpose-specific and handled as sensitive information.

12 How is confidential information handled during the assessment?

Assessment information should be shared only with authorised stakeholders and handled in accordance with the agreed engagement and confidentiality arrangements.

This includes credentials, technical evidence, screenshots, vulnerability details, architecture information and final reports.

VAPT reports are sensitive.

A detailed security report can reveal information about weaknesses in the environment and should therefore be protected appropriately.

04 / FINDINGS & RETEST

Moving from finding to closure

4 QUESTIONS
13 What does the VAPT report include?

A useful VAPT report should provide enough information for management to understand exposure and for technical teams to act.

01 Evidence

What was observed.

02 Impact

Why the weakness matters.

03 Severity

How it should be prioritised.

04 Remediation

What should change.

14 How are vulnerabilities prioritised?

Prioritisation should consider more than the number of vulnerabilities discovered.

Relevant factors can include severity, exploitability, exposure, affected assets, potential impact and the business context of the system.

Critical High Medium Low

The objective is to help teams focus remediation effort on the weaknesses that create the most meaningful risk.

15 Can Epicarp help us understand the findings and remediation priorities?

Yes. The value of VAPT comes from converting technical findings into clear remediation priorities.

Epicarp can help your application, infrastructure or security teams understand the findings, associated risk context and recommended remediation direction.

Implementation ownership may remain with the relevant customer technology team depending on the affected system.

16 Do you perform retesting after vulnerabilities are remediated?

Yes. Retesting helps verify whether the identified weaknesses have been effectively addressed.

01 Finding
02 Fix
03 Retest
04 Verify

The retest normally focuses on the relevant findings from the original assessment and records whether they are resolved, partially resolved or remain open.

07 Start Your Assessment

Scope the VAPT your environment actually needs.

Start with the application, mobile platform or infrastructure environment that matters most to your organisation. Epicarp can help define the assessment scope, testing approach and engagement boundaries before testing begins.

01
Application Security Web Application & API VAPT
Apps · Portals · APIs
02
Mobile Security Mobile Application VAPT
Android · iOS
03
Infrastructure Security Network VAPT
Internal · External
Not Sure Where to Start? Tell us about your environment and security requirement.
Discuss Your VAPT Requirement
One service or broader coverage — the scope starts with your environment. Web, Mobile and Network VAPT can be commissioned independently or combined when the security requirement spans multiple technology environments.
Engagement Scope → Assess → Improve